Revolutionizing Bleeding Control: The Impact of Endoscopic Powder in MIS

Effective control of haemostasis is critical to the success of any surgical procedure. Beyond minimizing intraoperative blood loss, it significantly reduces the risks associated with transfusions and postoperative complications. Yet, minimally invasive surgeries—like laparoscopic and endoscopic interventions—make bleeding control more complex because of restricted maneuverability and visibility.

With the rise of less invasive surgery, adaptable and efficient haemostatic agents are more vital than ever, especially where standard techniques fail.

 

 

Why Bleeding Control in MIS is Difficult

While MIS offers benefits such as shorter recovery and less scarring compared to open surgery, it brings new challenges. These positive factors, however, increase the complexity of haemostasis. The lack of space, restricted visibility, and absence of tactile cues make diffuse or irregular bleeding especially tough to address.

Suturing, tying, or cauterising are not always feasible in minimally invasive procedures. Here, topical haemostats such as endoscopic powders become essential, helping to control bleeding and improve surgical efficiency.

 

 

Spotlight on Surgi-ORC®-Based Endoscopic Powder

Among haemostatic powders, plant-based, absorbable types like Surgi-ORC® have demonstrated both safety and effectiveness. Introduced decades ago as a sheet, oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) is now available in powder form for today’s MIS challenges.

 

 

Key Benefits of Surgi-ORC® Endoscopic Powder

• Fast Bleeding Control: ORC speeds up clotting by promoting platelet adhesion
• Shape Plasticity: The granular structure of powdered haemostats and their shape plasticity allows them to conform easily to large and deep surface wounds
• Plant-Based Safety: Free from animal or human components, it reduces risks of immune reactions and disease transmission
• Antibacterial Environment: The oxidation process lowers pH, creating an acidic microenvironment that offers bactericidal benefits
• Fully Absorbable: Powder dissolves safely, posing no harm to nerves or vessels

These characteristics make Surgi-ORC® endoscopic powder an ideal choice for managing mild to moderate bleeding—especially capillary, venous, or small arterial oozing in confined spaces.

 

 

Optimizing Application with Delivery Devices in MIS

How the powder is delivered greatly influences its effectiveness in surgery. In MIS, bellows pump-based applicators are widely used to deliver endoscopic powder with accuracy and control.

 

 

Operation of Endoscopic Powder Applicators

Syringe-style bellows devices, fitted with short or long tips, can deliver powder through MIS access points. Compressing the bellows dispenses a controlled amount of powder right onto the bleed, maintaining clear visibility.

 

 

Best Practices for Using Endoscopic Powder

• Orientation: The angle of device orientation (vertical vs. horizontal) has a significant impact on the amount and spread of the powder. Surprisingly, orientation often affects performance more than the speed or force of compression
• Powder Characteristics: Particle size, flow, and how the powder handles moisture will affect performance
• Surgeon Technique: Output depends on the speed and force used when compressing the bellows

 

 

Clinical Uses of Endoscopic Powder

When working in tight spaces or near fragile tissues, endoscopic powder is especially useful. Its flexible form lets it cover both wide wounds and tight spaces with equal efficiency.

Endoscopic Powder is Commonly Used For:

• Laparoscopic liver resections
• Cardiothoracic
• Gynaecology MIS surgeries
• Endoscopic procedures like ESD
• Urological surgeries

Using endoscopic powder helps surgeons see better, stop bleeding quicker, and complete operations faster—often with less need for transfusions and better patient outcomes.

 

 

Clinical Evidence: Proven Performance of ORC Powder

Research on SURGICEL® Powder in 103 surgical patients found:

• Hemostasis was achieved in 87.4% of cases at 5 minutes, and 92.2% at 10 minutes
• Excellent results across open and minimally invasive surgeries
• No complications such as rebleeding, thromboembolism, or side effects reported
• Surgeons noted its ease of use, accuracy, and minimal need for extra measures

Overall, the data shows SURGICEL® Powder as a safe, effective, and adaptable haemostatic agent—especially when conventional tools aren’t enough.

 

 

Summary

The future of MIS depends on effective, next-generation haemostatic agents. ORC-based endoscopic powders offer surgeons rapid, flexible, and reliable bleeding control options.

No matter the complexity—be it confined spaces, delicate organs, or irregular wounds—ORC endoscopic powder ensures safe, effective bleeding control for today’s surgical demands.

 

 

References

1. Zhang Y, Song D, Huang H, Liang Z, Liu H, Huang Y, Zhong C, Ye G. Minimally invasive hemostatic materials: tackling a dilemma of fluidity and adhesion by photopolymerization in situ. Scientific Reports. 2017 Nov 10;7(1):15250.

2. De la Torre RA, Bachman SL, Wheeler AA, Bartow KN, Scott JS. Hemostasis and hemostatic agents in minimally invasive surgery. Surgery. 2007 Oct 1;142(4):S39-45.

3. Al-Attar N, de Jonge E, Kocharian R, Ilie B, Barnett E, Berrevoet F. Safety and hemostatic effectiveness of SURGICEL® powder in mild and moderate intraoperative bleeding. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. 2023 Jul;29:10760296231190376.

4. Xiao X, Wu Z. A narrative review of different hemostatic materials in emergency treatment of trauma. Emerg Med Int. 2022;2022: 6023261

5. Stark M, Wang AY, Corrigan B, Woldu HG, Azizighannad S, Cipolla G, Kocharian R, De Leon H. Comparative analyses of the hemostatic efficacy and surgical device performance of powdered Endoscopic Powder oxidized regenerated cellulose and starch-based powder formulations. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2025 Jan 1;9(1):102668.

6. Bustamante-Balén M, Plumé G. Role of hemostatic powders in the endoscopic management of gastrointestinal bleeding. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology. 2014 Aug 15;5(3):284.